莫仕围, 赵欢, 李楚豪, 张梦莹, 王忠旭, 贾宁. 基于穿戴式能耗仪调查铁路隧道施工典型工种体力劳动强度[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(2): 148-153. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.02.002
引用本文: 莫仕围, 赵欢, 李楚豪, 张梦莹, 王忠旭, 贾宁. 基于穿戴式能耗仪调查铁路隧道施工典型工种体力劳动强度[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(2): 148-153. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.02.002
MO Shiwei, ZHAO Huan, LI Chuhao, ZHANG Mengying, WANG Zhongxu, JIA Ning. Survey on intensity of physical work of workers with different tasks in railway tunnel construction using wearable energy consumption meter[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(2): 148-153. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.02.002
Citation: MO Shiwei, ZHAO Huan, LI Chuhao, ZHANG Mengying, WANG Zhongxu, JIA Ning. Survey on intensity of physical work of workers with different tasks in railway tunnel construction using wearable energy consumption meter[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(2): 148-153. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.02.002

基于穿戴式能耗仪调查铁路隧道施工典型工种体力劳动强度

Survey on intensity of physical work of workers with different tasks in railway tunnel construction using wearable energy consumption meter

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于ActiGraph GT3X+设备对铁路隧道施工典型工种的体力劳动强度进行调查分析,以期为科学监管铁路隧道施工人员健康提供依据。
    方法 2022年7—8月,从铁路隧道施工现场典型工种招募24名工人(电焊工3人,立架工7人,防水工4人,钢筋工10人)参加本研究。利用佩戴在优势侧手腕的人体能量消耗仪连续记录其全天24 h的身体活动3 ~ 5 d。基于加速度计提供的每分活动计数、能量消耗、代谢当量等估算各工种的劳动强度。采用单因素方差分析比较不同工种之间的差异。
    结果 23名工人完成了调查。防水工、钢筋工、电焊工和立架工单位小时内的活动计数指标,除最大活动计数之外,活动计数的总和、平均值和每分活动计数差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且防水工的活动计数值最大(P<0.05)。4个工种单位时间内的能量消耗分别为(1 303.0 ± 78.5)、(760.8 ± 24.5)、(554.8 ± 91.4)和(521.9 ± 30.4)kcals(1 kcal = 4.184 kJ),各组之间差异有统计学意义(F = 5.72,P = 0.006);代谢当量分别为(2.89 ± 0.22)、(2.57 ± 0.39)、(1.81 ± 0.07)和(1.70 ± 0.27)METs,各组之间差异有统计学意义(F = 6.99,P = 0.002)。
    结论 不同隧道施工典型工种的劳动强度不同,防水工的体力劳动强度相当于Ⅲ级(重强度),钢筋工、电焊工和立架工属Ⅱ级(中等强度)。隧道施工管理方应重视不同工种之间体力劳动强度的差异,合理制定劳动限额和分配人力资源,保护工人身心健康和作业安全。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This study aimed to investigate the intensity of the physical work of workers with typical tasks in railway tunnel construction in order to provide support for scientifically monitoring workers’ health.
    Methods From July to August 2022, 24 workers with different tasks (3 electric welders, 7 erectors, 4 waterproofers, and 10 steel bar workers) were recruited in tunnel construction site. Their physical activities were recorded for 24-hours for 3-5 consecutive days using the energy consumption meter on the dominant wrist. The intensity of physical work was estimated based on counts per minute, energy consumption, and metabolic equivalent. One-way ANOVA tests were used to compare differences in the intensity of physical work among different workers.
    Results Finally, 23 workers completed the investigation. Except for the maximum counts, significant statistical differences were detected in total counts, average counts, and counts per minute among the waterproofers, steel bar workers, electric welders, and erecters (P < 0.05). Particularly, the activity meter value of waterproofing workers was the largest (P < 0.05). The energy expenditure per unit time for the four types of work was (1 303.0 ± 78.5), (760.8 ± 24.5), (554.8 ± 91.4) and (521.9 ± 30.4) kcals (1 kcal = 4.184 kJ), and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (F = 5.72, P = 0.006); the metabolic equivalents were (2.89 ± 0.22), (2.57 ± 0.39), (1.81 ± 0.07) and (1.70 ± 0.27) METs, respectively. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (F = 6.99, P = 0.002).
    Conclusions The intensity of physical work varied greatly among workers with different tasks in railway tunnel construction. The intensity of physical work of the waterproofers was equivalent to Level Ⅲ(heavy intensity), while Level Ⅱ(medium intensity) was for the other workers. The manager in tunnel construction should pay attention to the differences in intensity of physical work among workers with different tasks, reasonably set labor quotas, and allocate human resources for protecting workers’ physical and mental health.

     

/

返回文章
返回