郭薇薇, 齐秀会. 天津市某区医务人员职业倦怠影响因素的组态分析:基于模糊集定性比较分析J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250362
引用本文: 郭薇薇, 齐秀会. 天津市某区医务人员职业倦怠影响因素的组态分析:基于模糊集定性比较分析J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250362
GUO Weiwei, QI Xiuhui. Configurational analysis of influencing factors of job burnout among medical staff in a district of Tianjin using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysisJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250362
Citation: GUO Weiwei, QI Xiuhui. Configurational analysis of influencing factors of job burnout among medical staff in a district of Tianjin using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysisJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250362

天津市某区医务人员职业倦怠影响因素的组态分析:基于模糊集定性比较分析

Configurational analysis of influencing factors of job burnout among medical staff in a district of Tianjin using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

  • 摘要: 目的 探索医务人员职业倦怠的影响因素和组态路径,提出预防和减轻医务人员职业倦怠的措施。方法 选取执业地点在天津市某区的不同级别公立医院的64名医务人员作为研究对象,采用《职业风险感知量表》和《马氏职业倦怠量表》对其开展问卷调查,确定影响医务人员职业倦怠的主要因素,并使用模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA),探索职业倦怠的核心影响因素及组态路径。结果 64名医务人员职业倦怠总分值为(33.06 ± 13.41)分,条目均分为(2.2 ± 0.89)分,职业倦怠检出率为60.94%(39人)。识别出导致医务人员职业倦怠有5个组态路径,所有路径的一致性均高于0.8的阈值(范围:0.849 ~ 0.974),总体解一致性达0.896,总体覆盖率为0.582。组态1 ~ 4均是以工作负荷+职业损伤风险为核心条件,辅以个人发展、社会关系或组织管理等风险因素,构成“身体感受因素”引致型职业倦怠路径;组态5表明在工作负荷、组织管理与社会关系风险均处于较低水平的情境下,若医务人员同时面临高个人发展风险、高经济风险与高职业损伤风险3个核心条件,仍会引发职业倦怠,形成“心理激励因素”引致型路径。结论 职业倦怠是多重风险条件在不同情境下以特定组合方式共同作用的结果。应从身体感受因素和心理激励因素出发,减轻医务人员的工作负荷,预防职业损伤,解决个人发展和经济收入问题,降低职业倦怠风险。

     

    Abstract: Objective To explore the mechanisms and configurational paths of factors influencing job burnout of medical staff in order to propose preventing and alleviating measures against such conditions. Methods A total of 64 medical staff from public hospitals of various levels in a district of Tianjin were surveyed with questionnaires of the Occupational Risk Perception Scale and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was utilized to identify the core influencing factors and configurational paths leading to job burnout. Results The mean of the total score of job burnout among 64 medical staff was (33.06 ± 13.41) points, with an average item score of (2.2 ± 0.89) points. The prevalence of job burnout was 60.94% (n = 39). Five configurational paths leading to job burnout were identified. The consistency of these five paths exceeded the threshold of 0.8 (range: 0.849 to 0.974), with an overall solution consistency of 0.896 and an overall coverage of 0.582. Configurations 1 to 4 formed the “physical sensation-induced” burnout paths, identifying “workload” and “occupational injury risk” as core conditions and risk factors such as personal development, social relations, or organizational management as supplementary factors. Configuration 5 formed the “psychological incentive-induced” path, which demonstrated that burnout was triggered by 3 core conditions of high personal development risk, high economic risk, and high occupational injury risk, even when workload, organizational management, and social relation risk were relatively low. Conclusions Job burnout of medical staff emerged from the specific interplay of multiple risks across various contexts. Interventions should target both physical sensation factors and psychological incentive factors by reducing workload, preventing occupational injuries, and addressing personal development and economic income issues in order to lower the risk of job burnout among medical staff.

     

/

返回文章
返回