吾超, 查宁, 李楠, 张凯, 何帅, 郎红娟. 生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系的构建J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250457
引用本文: 吾超, 查宁, 李楠, 张凯, 何帅, 郎红娟. 生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系的构建J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250457
WU Chao, ZHA Ning, LI Nan, ZHANG Kai, HE Shuai, LANG Hongjuan. Construction of a regional coordination capability index system for emergency medical responders to biosafety incidentsJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250457
Citation: WU Chao, ZHA Ning, LI Nan, ZHANG Kai, HE Shuai, LANG Hongjuan. Construction of a regional coordination capability index system for emergency medical responders to biosafety incidentsJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(1): 77-82. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250457

生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系的构建

Construction of a regional coordination capability index system for emergency medical responders to biosafety incidents

  • 摘要: 目的 构建生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系,为制定跨区域应急联动策略、优化资源调配、增强生物安全风险应对能力提供参考依据。方法 通过文献研究、质性访谈与德尔菲专家函询等方法,构建生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系。结果 两轮德尔菲函询有效问卷回收率均为100%(22/22);函询专家的判断系数为0.945,熟悉程度为0.873,权威程度为0.909;第一轮函询各级指标的肯德尔协调系数为0.203、0.262、0.256,第二轮函询为0.230、0.327、0.278(均P < 0.01)。构建的生物安全事件应急救护人员区域协同能力指标体系包含5个一级指标,包括组织架构与协同机制、资源保障能力、信息共享与沟通、技术能力与培训、协同响应效率,对应权重分别为0.196、0.194、0.194、0.206、0.211,下属13个二级指标和38个三级指标。结论 该指标体系能够为优化应急响应流程、完善跨区域协同方案以及提升生物安全事件整体处置水平提供参考,具有较强的实践指导价值。

     

    Abstract: Objective To develop a regional coordination capability index system for emergency medical responders to biosafety incidents, thereby providing a reference for formulating cross-regional emergency coordination strategies, optimizing resource allocation, and strengthening biosafety risk response capacity. Methods An index system was developed through literature review, qualitative interviews, and the Delphi method. Results The effective questionnaire response rate for both rounds of Delphi consultation was 100% (22/22). The experts’ judgment coefficient was 0.945, familiarity coefficient was 0.873, and authority coefficient was 0.909. The Kendall’s concordance coefficients for the first-round of consultation across indicator level were 0.203, 0.262, and 0.256, and for the second round were 0.230, 0.327, and 0.278 (all P < 0.01). The constructed regional coordination capability index system comprised five first-level indicators: organizational structure and coordination mechanisms, resource support capacity, information-sharing and communication technology capability, training and collaborative response efficiency, with corresponding weights of 0.196, 0.194, 0.194, 0.206, and 0.211, respectively. These were further divided into 13 second-level indicators and 38 third-level indicators. Conclusions The proposed index system can provide a valuable reference for optimizing emergency response processes, improving cross-regional collaboration frameworks, and enhancing overall capacity for managing biosafety incidents, demonstrating strong practical value.

     

/

返回文章
返回