朱勇, 韩磊, 刘炘. 从事铬盐生产及镀铬作业工人六价铬接触水平及其职业健康风险J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(2): 165-168, 195. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250537
引用本文: 朱勇, 韩磊, 刘炘. 从事铬盐生产及镀铬作业工人六价铬接触水平及其职业健康风险J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(2): 165-168, 195. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250537
ZHU Yong, HAN Lei, LIU Xin. Levels of exposure to hexavalent chromium and occupational health risks among workers engaged in chromate salt production or chromium plating operationsJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(2): 165-168, 195. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250537
Citation: ZHU Yong, HAN Lei, LIU Xin. Levels of exposure to hexavalent chromium and occupational health risks among workers engaged in chromate salt production or chromium plating operationsJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(2): 165-168, 195. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250537

从事铬盐生产及镀铬作业工人六价铬接触水平及其职业健康风险

Levels of exposure to hexavalent chromium and occupational health risks among workers engaged in chromate salt production or chromium plating operations

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解我国典型的铬盐生产及镀铬行业在当前可及的经济技术条件下,劳动者接触六价铬化合物的浓度及职业健康风险。
    方法 选取国内技术工艺先进的某铬盐生产企业及某镀铬企业作为研究对象,通过现场职业卫生调查收集相关数据,检测工作场所空气中六价铬浓度,并利用GBZ/T 298—2017《工作场所化学有害因素职业健康风险评估技术导则》中的模型,评估劳动者吸入六价铬的非致癌风险和致癌风险。
    结果 两家企业各岗位接触六价铬的时间加权平均浓度(CTWA)范围为0.071 ~ 29.484 μg/m3。两家企业接触六价铬的33个岗位中,劳动者吸入六价铬的非致癌风险均为不可接受(100%)和致癌风险为不可接受的占81.8%(27个)。其中,铬盐生产企业接触六价铬岗位的劳动者非致癌风险为不可接受的比例为100%(24/24),致癌风险为不可接受的占75%(18/24);镀铬企业所检测的9个岗位中,劳动者吸入六价铬的非致癌风险和致癌风险均不可接受(100%)。两个行业间非致癌风险和致癌风险不可接受率的差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
    结论 铬盐生产及镀铬行业的职业健康风险仍较高,建议各企业采取升级工艺、更新设备以及替换材料等措施,切实降低工作场所空气中六价铬浓度,从而降低劳动者因吸入六价铬导致的健康风险。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the exposure levels and occupational health risks of workers exposed to hexavalent chromium compounds in the chromate production and chrome plating industries in China under currently accessible economic and technological conditions.
    Methods A chromate production enterprise and a chrome plating enterprise with domestic advanced technologies and processes were selected as study subjects. Relevant data were collected through occupational health investigations, and airborne hexavalent chromium concentration in workplaces was measured. The models specified in Technical Guidelines for Occupational Health Risk Assessment of Chemical Hazards in the Workplace (GBZ/T 298-2017) were applied to evaluate the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks associated with inhalation exposure to hexavalent chromium.
    Results The time-weighted average concentrations (CTWA) of hexavalent chromium exposure across different job positions in the two enterprises ranged from 0.071 to 29.484 μg/m3. Among the 33 job positions exposed to hexavalent chromium in two enterprises, the worker's non-carcinogenic risk from inhalation exposure to hexavalent chromium was unacceptable in 100% of the positions, and the carcinogenic risk was unacceptable in 81.8% (27 job positions). Specifically, in the chromium salt production enterprise, the proportion of workers exposed to hexavalent chromium with unacceptable non-carcinogenic risk was 100% (24/24 job positions), and the proportion with unacceptable carcinogenic risk was 75% (18/24 job positions). In the chrome plating enterprise, both the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks from inhalation exposure to hexavalent chromium among workers were unacceptable (100%, 9/9 job positions). No statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of unacceptable non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks between these two industries (both P > 0.05).
    Conclusions Occupational health risks in the chromate production and chrome plating industries remain high. Enterprises are advised to implement measures such as upgrading processes, renewing equipment, and substituting materials to effectively reduce the concentration of hexavalent chromium in workplace air and thereby lower the health risks to workers caused by inhalation exposure.

     

/

返回文章
返回