奚兴, 方明明, 许婷, 周寒寒, 蒋文婕, 朱晓艳. 高校师生急救素养的多因素影响分析:来自江苏省首届高校急救教育展示活动的实证研究J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(2): 219-223, 234. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250558
引用本文: 奚兴, 方明明, 许婷, 周寒寒, 蒋文婕, 朱晓艳. 高校师生急救素养的多因素影响分析:来自江苏省首届高校急救教育展示活动的实证研究J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(2): 219-223, 234. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250558
XI Xing, FANG Mingming, XU Ting, ZHOU Hanhan, JIANG Wenjie, ZHU Xiaoyan. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing first-aid literacy among university faculty and students: an empirical study based on the first university first-aid education showcase in Jiangsu ProvinceJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(2): 219-223, 234. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250558
Citation: XI Xing, FANG Mingming, XU Ting, ZHOU Hanhan, JIANG Wenjie, ZHU Xiaoyan. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing first-aid literacy among university faculty and students: an empirical study based on the first university first-aid education showcase in Jiangsu ProvinceJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(2): 219-223, 234. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.250558

高校师生急救素养的多因素影响分析:来自江苏省首届高校急救教育展示活动的实证研究

Multivariate analysis of factors influencing first-aid literacy among university faculty and students: an empirical study based on the first university first-aid education showcase in Jiangsu Province

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较高校师生在标准化急救理论知识和操作技能上的表现差异,从多维度探究影响高校师生急救素养的因素,为制定不同类型高校急救教育建设方案提供依据。
    方法 基于江苏省首届高校急救教育展示活动,对来自20所高校的140名参赛选手的理论和技能水平进行标准化评分,并对选手基本信息进行收集,分析其成绩差异及其影响因素。
    结果 140名师生的理论成绩得分为40 ~ 100分,平均(79.8 ± 14.6)分;技能成绩为68.9 ~ 92.2分,平均(85.3 ± 3.9)分。相较于男性选手,女性选手的理论成绩提高7.035分,技能成绩提高2.528分;相较于18 ~ 25岁的年龄段,每增加一个年龄段(25 ~ 35岁,>35岁),理论成绩平均增加5.105分;相较于个人专业背景为非医学组,医学组的理论成绩提高了8.145分;相较于高职校组,大学本科组的理论成绩提高了6.707分;相较于学生组,体育老师、校医、辅导员组的技能成绩分别降低了2.548分、3.197分和4.185分(以上均P < 0.01)。
    结论 师生急救素养差异显著,院校类型和专业背景在一定程度上影响了师生的急救素养。建议建立常态化复训机制,完善急救教育标准体系,强化非医学院校教职工培训,提升高校的整体急救能力。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the performance differences in standardized first-aid theoretical knowledge and practical skills among university faculty and students, examine multidimensional factors influencing first-aid literacy, and provide a basis for developing first-aid education programs in different types of higher education institutions.
    Methods Based on the first university first-aid education showcase in Jiangsu Province, standardized scoring of theoretical and practical performance was conducted among 140 participants from 20 universities. Basic demographic and background information of participants was collected to analyze performance differences and their influencing factors.
    Results Among the 140 faculty and student participants, theoretical scores ranged from 40 to 100 points, with a mean of (79.8 ± 14.6) points; practical skill scores ranged from 68.9 to 92.2 points, with a mean of (85.3 ± 3.9) points. Compared with male participants, female participants had theoretical scores 7.035 points higher and practical skill scores 2.528 points higher. Compared with the 18 to 25 age group, each increase in age category (25 to 35 years, > 35 years) was associated with an average increase of 5.105 points in theoretical scores. Compared with the non-medical professional background group, the medical background group had theoretical scores 8.145 points higher. Compared with the higher vocational college group, the university/undergraduate group had theoretical scores 6.707 points higher. Compared with the student group, the physical education teachers, school physicians, and counselor group had practical skill scores 2.548, 3.197, and 4.185 points lower, respectively (all P < 0.01).
    Conclusions There were significant differences in first-aid literacy among university faculty and students. Institution type and professional background exerted measurable influence on first-aid competence. It is recommended to establish regular refresher training, improve standardized first-aid education systems, and strengthen training for non-medical institutions and university staff in order to enhance overall first-aid capacity.

     

/

返回文章
返回