邓璐, 孙奥, 吴瑕, 倪红珍, 马传梁, 程刚. 职业健康检查质量控制策略探讨:基于四川省6年质量评估工作的实践与思考J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(3): 302-306,332. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.260226
引用本文: 邓璐, 孙奥, 吴瑕, 倪红珍, 马传梁, 程刚. 职业健康检查质量控制策略探讨:基于四川省6年质量评估工作的实践与思考J. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2026, 44(3): 302-306,332. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.260226
DENG Lu, SUN Ao, WU Xia, NI Hongzhen, MA Chuanliang, CHENG Gang. Quality control strategies for occupational health examination: a study based on practice and reflections from six years of quality assessment in Sichuan ProvinceJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(3): 302-306,332. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.260226
Citation: DENG Lu, SUN Ao, WU Xia, NI Hongzhen, MA Chuanliang, CHENG Gang. Quality control strategies for occupational health examination: a study based on practice and reflections from six years of quality assessment in Sichuan ProvinceJ. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2026, 44(3): 302-306,332. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2026.260226

职业健康检查质量控制策略探讨:基于四川省6年质量评估工作的实践与思考

Quality control strategies for occupational health examination: a study based on practice and reflections from six years of quality assessment in Sichuan Province

  • 摘要:

    目的 总结四川省2020—2025年职业健康检查质量评估工作的实践经验,分析当前职业健康检查质量控制面临的核心问题,探讨提升质控效能的策略。

    方法 基于四川省2020—2025年连续6年的职业健康检查机构质量评估数据,对330家备案机构(含疾控中心/职防院、公立医疗机构、民营医疗机构)的综合评估结果、关键技术指标(听力图谱判读、尘肺胸片质量与判读、血铅及染色体畸变分析等)开展系统分析,并进行两轮次横向比较。

    结果 6年累计评估机构740家次,整体合格率从2020年的80.0%提升至2025年的81.5%,两轮次间总体合格率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);听力图谱判读和血铅检测合格率在两轮间显著提升(均P < 0.05)。机构类型是质量差异的重要影响因素,第一轮评估中不同机构类型间合格率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),第二轮差距明显缩小。染色体畸变分析是当前最突出的技术短板,2025年参评机构合格率仅39.7%。此外,质量管理体系形式化、主检医师能力不足、信息报告质量偏低等问题仍较为突出。

    结论 以问题为导向、以评估为抓手、以结果应用为目标形成闭环的质控模式,能够有效推动机构整体质量水平提升。建议进一步构建“准入—考核—退出”闭环管理制度,建立主检医师能力认证与积分管理机制,实施关键技术项目专项攻坚,并推进智慧化、精准化质控,切实保障劳动者职业健康权益。

     

    Abstract:

    Objective To summarize the practical experience of occupational health examination (OHE) quality assessment in Sichuan Province from 2020 to 2025, analyze the core challenges currently faced in quality control, and explore strategies to improve quality control effectiveness of quality control.

    Methods Based on six consecutive years of quality assessment data from 330 registered OHE institutions in Sichuan Province, including centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)/occupational disease prevention institutes, public hospitals, and private medical institutions, a systematic analysis was conducted on comprehensive evaluation results and key technical indicators such as audiogram interpretation, pneumoconiosis chest X-ray quality and interpretation, blood lead testing, and chromosomal aberration analysis. Two rounds of cross-sectional comparisons were performed.

    Results A total of 740 OHE institution visits were assessed over the six years. The overall compliance rate increased from 80.0% in 2020 to 81.5% in 2025, with a statistically significant improvement between the two rounds of assessment (P < 0.05). Compliance rates for audiogram interpretation and blood lead testing improved significantly between the two rounds (both P < 0.05). The type of OHE institution was an important determinant of quality outcomes; statistically significant differences of compliance rate among institution types were observed in the first round (P < 0.05), but the gap narrowed substantially in the second round. Chromosomal aberration analysis was currently the most critical technical weakness, with a compliance rate of only 39.7% in 2025. Additionally, the issues such as formalistic quality management systems, insufficient competency of chief physicians in charge of OHE, and low quality of information reporting were still quite prominent.

    Conclusions A closed-loop quality control model, guided by problems, driven by assessments, and oriented by results, can effectively promote overall quality improvement among OHE institutions. It is recommended to further establish a closed-loop management system covering“registration-assessment-withdrawal”; implement a competency certification and credit scoring system for chief physicians in charge of OHE; launch targeted capacity-building initiatives for critical technical items; and advance intelligent and precision-based quality control measures in order to better safeguard workers’occupational health rights.

     

/

返回文章
返回