杜伟佳, 周浩, 张晋蔚, 黄敏之, 吴嘉敏, 刘移民. 广州市工业企业生产性粉尘现况调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2015, 33(5): 329-331. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.05.006
引用本文: 杜伟佳, 周浩, 张晋蔚, 黄敏之, 吴嘉敏, 刘移民. 广州市工业企业生产性粉尘现况调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2015, 33(5): 329-331. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.05.006
DU Weijia, ZHOU Hao, ZHANG Jinwei, HUANG MinZhi, WU Jiamin, LIU Yimin. Investigation on dust hazards of enterprises in Guangzhou City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2015, 33(5): 329-331. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.05.006
Citation: DU Weijia, ZHOU Hao, ZHANG Jinwei, HUANG MinZhi, WU Jiamin, LIU Yimin. Investigation on dust hazards of enterprises in Guangzhou City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2015, 33(5): 329-331. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.05.006

广州市工业企业生产性粉尘现况调查

Investigation on dust hazards of enterprises in Guangzhou City

  • 摘要: 目的 了解广州市当前主要工业企业生产性粉尘的分布特点及危害现状,为该地区粉尘危害的控制及行政管理部门开展管理工作提供数据参考。 方法 在2012-2013年间委托开展职业病危害定期检测的企业中,按机械制造、金属加工、制药、电力、化工、食品饮料等9种主要行业进行分层随机抽样,共抽取67家企业,对其职业卫生学调查资料和粉尘检测报告数据进行分析。 结果 共检出19种生产性粉尘,其中主要类型有电焊烟尘、有机粉尘、金属粉尘、煤尘、砂轮磨尘、矽尘、铝合金粉尘、其他粉尘等8种。电焊烟尘、金属粉尘和砂轮磨尘主要分布在机械制造和金属加工业,有机粉尘集中分布在医药、食品饮料和橡胶塑料制造业,煤尘主要分布在电力产业,矽尘分布在建筑建材和机械制造业。企业超标率为16.4%,点超标率为2.95%,以I级危害为主,粉尘点超标率最高的是有机粉尘的7.14%。粉尘作业超标的行业以食品饮料、制药及机械制造业为主。 结论 广州市67家主要工业企业总体粉尘超标情况尚可,对人体危害性大的粉尘(矽尘、煤尘、电焊烟尘)超标率低,控制效果较好,而有机粉尘、金属粉尘等对人体危害性小的粉尘超标情况较突出,需引起注意。

     

    Abstract: Objective To understand the characteristics of dust hazards of selected enterprises, and to provide the orientation for work on occupational health management in the future. Methods The working environment monitoring data from 67 companies from 2012 to 2013, involving in machinery manufacturing, metal processing, pharmaceutical, electric power, chemical, food and beverage,etc, in Guangzhou were evaluated. Results Nineteen types of industrial dusts were found and the major types were welding fume-dust, organic dust, metallic dust, coal dust, grinding wheel dust, silicious dust, aluminum-alloy dust, and other dusts. We found 16.4 percent of the enterprises and 2.95 percent of the points exceeding the standards, and the non-compliance varied from 1.35% to 7.14% according to the mentioned classification of dust types, while the non-compliance of organic dust was the highest as 7.14%, which were often reported in the enterprises related to the food and beverage, pharmaceutical and machinery manufacturing. Conclusion Though the high-risk dusts, such as silicious dust, coal dust and welding fume-dust, were not obvious, more attention should be given to the low-risk dusts, such as organic and metal dusts.

     

/

返回文章
返回