陈仁强, 翟记文, 李相鑫. 用人单位职业病危害风险分级管控体系建设实施指南在某苯乙烯装置中运用[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2017, 35(2): 103-106. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.02.002
引用本文: 陈仁强, 翟记文, 李相鑫. 用人单位职业病危害风险分级管控体系建设实施指南在某苯乙烯装置中运用[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2017, 35(2): 103-106. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.02.002
CHEN Renqiang, ZHAI Jiwen, LI Xiangxin. Classification of occupational hazards in a project of styrene device of petrochemical enterprise: Application of the guidelines for implementation of occupational hazard management system[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2017, 35(2): 103-106. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.02.002
Citation: CHEN Renqiang, ZHAI Jiwen, LI Xiangxin. Classification of occupational hazards in a project of styrene device of petrochemical enterprise: Application of the guidelines for implementation of occupational hazard management system[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2017, 35(2): 103-106. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.02.002

用人单位职业病危害风险分级管控体系建设实施指南在某苯乙烯装置中运用

Classification of occupational hazards in a project of styrene device of petrochemical enterprise: Application of the guidelines for implementation of occupational hazard management system

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨用人单位职业病危害风险分级管控体系建设实施指南对职业病危害风险评估的适用性。
    方法 以某石化企业苯乙烯装置为调查对象, 对其职业病危害进行调查; 采用用人单位职业病危害风险分级管控体系建设实施指南确定各作业岗位、作业场所职业病危害风险等级。
    结果 该单位工人接触苯、甲苯、乙苯、苯乙烯、噪声等职业病危害。苯乙烯装置巡检工、化验工和罐区巡检工为中度危害作业岗位, 内操和装卸工为轻度危害作业岗位。作业场所职业病危害风险等级为显著危险。
    结论 采用该定量评估方法能够综合考虑各岗位所有职业病危害因素, 确定各岗位、作业场所的职业病危害风险等级, 该实施指南切实可行。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Based on the guidelines for implementation of occupational hazard management system, the occupational hazards in a project of styrene device of petrochemical enterprise were evaluated; furthermore the feasibility of these guidelines was discussed.
    Methods The occupational hazards in a styrene device of petrochemical enterprise was studied. The occupational health survey was done; the necessary information related to chemical exposure was collected and the exposure levels at work environments were measured. The classification of occupational hazards was done based on the guidelines.
    Results The workers exposed to benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, styrene and noise in this project. The occupational hazard of workers engaged in inspection and analysis in the laboratory was ranked as middle level, while the hazard of workers engaged in the operation and stevedoring was ranked as mild. The risk level of these occupational hazards at these workplaces was relatively high.
    Conclusion Comprehensively considering all hazards at workplaces and use of quantitative evaluation method were appropriate to evaluate the occupational hazard risk. These guidelines are useful.

     

/

返回文章
返回