赵乾魁, 方锦斌, 李克勇, 孙原, 刘武忠. 上海市金山工业区职业健康现况调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2018, 36(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.02.005
引用本文: 赵乾魁, 方锦斌, 李克勇, 孙原, 刘武忠. 上海市金山工业区职业健康现况调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2018, 36(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.02.005
shu
ZHAO Qiankui, FANG Jinbin, LI Keyong, SUN Yuan, LIU Wuzhong. Investigation on occupational health work status of enterprises located in Jinshan Industrial Zone in Shanghai[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2018, 36(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.02.005
Citation: ZHAO Qiankui, FANG Jinbin, LI Keyong, SUN Yuan, LIU Wuzhong. Investigation on occupational health work status of enterprises located in Jinshan Industrial Zone in Shanghai[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2018, 36(2): 109-112. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.02.005
shu

上海市金山工业区职业健康现况调查

Investigation on occupational health work status of enterprises located in Jinshan Industrial Zone in Shanghai

    摘要
  • 摘要:
    目的 掌握上海市金山工业区生产企业的职业病危害、职业病防治和职业卫生管理现状, 探索金山工业区职业卫生技术服务和监管的新模式, 维护劳动者的职业健康权益。
    方法 确定存在职业病危害企业后, 通过单纯随机抽样的方式, 选择87家企业, 调查企业的基本情况、管理机构和人员、职业病危害因素分布、职业病防护设施、个人防护用品、职业健康监护、培训等情况。
    结果 被调查企业以小型企业为主(69家, 占79.31%), 经济类型以私营企业为主(56家, 占64.37%), 职业病危害风险较重企业64家, 占73.56%;粉尘、噪声、重金属、烃类、酯类、酮类、酸碱等职业病危害因素广泛存在; 职业病危害因素检测合格率为92.14%, 但65.00%的企业检测布点不合理或有遗漏; 接害人员总体检率为76.99%, 未发现职业病患者; 职业卫生管理人员配置符合要求的企业60家, 符合率68.97%。
    结论 金山工业区被调查生产企业存在着职业病危害因素识别缺失错漏、部分职业病危害因素检测工作不规范、职业卫生人员配置不足、职业健康体检率不高等问题。工业园区应改进职业卫生服务监管模式, 将技术服务支撑和职业卫生监管有效结合。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the status of occupational hazards, prevention and control of occupational disease, and occupational health management of enterprises located in Jinshan Industrial Zone of Shanghai; To explore the appropriate model of occupational health service and supervision, in order to protect the health rights and interests of workers.
    Methods Totally 87 enterprises were investigated and their basic information, data on management organization and staff, occupational hazards, protective facility, personal protective equipment, occupational health surveillance and training practice were collected.
    Results Among these enterprises, 69 were small-scaled and 56 were privately owned. In 64 enterprises (73.56%), the workers exposed to occupational hazards widely, including dust, noise, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, esters, ketones, and acid-base. The examination showed that 92.14% samples were lower than the national exposure limits, but It was obvious that 65.00% sampling areas were arranged unreasonably while the occupational hazards were monitored. The occupational health surveillance rate was 76.99% among workers exposed to hazards, but no workers were diagnosed with occupational disease.
    Conclusion There were some problems in these enterprises. Among them, not all occupational hazards were identified and monitored and occupational health surveillance rate was low. There were not enough professionals or mangers on occupational health work. Both administrative supervision and technical support should be reinforced to improve occupational health work in industrial zone.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(13)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回