朱德香, 郭美琼, 黄先青, 罗孝文. 深圳市77 319名噪声作业员工听力监测结果分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2018, 36(4): 308-311. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.04.007
引用本文: 朱德香, 郭美琼, 黄先青, 罗孝文. 深圳市77 319名噪声作业员工听力监测结果分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2018, 36(4): 308-311. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.04.007
ZHU Dexiang, GUO Meiqiong, HUANG Xianqing, LUO Xiaowen. Data analysis of hearing surveillance of 77 319 noise-exposed workers in Shenzhen City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2018, 36(4): 308-311. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.04.007
Citation: ZHU Dexiang, GUO Meiqiong, HUANG Xianqing, LUO Xiaowen. Data analysis of hearing surveillance of 77 319 noise-exposed workers in Shenzhen City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2018, 36(4): 308-311. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.04.007

深圳市77 319名噪声作业员工听力监测结果分析

Data analysis of hearing surveillance of 77 319 noise-exposed workers in Shenzhen City

  • 摘要:
    目的 了解深圳市噪声作业员工职业健康状况, 为该市预防与控制职业性噪声聋提供科学依据。
    方法 按照《国家重点职业病监测与职业健康风险评估工作方案》要求, 收集深圳市噪声作业员工重点职业病监测数据进行统计学分析。
    结果 2017年深圳市所监测的噪声作业员工为77 319人, 监测对象听力损失检出率为9.48%, 疑似职业性噪声聋检出率0.28%, 职业性噪声聋检出率0.17%。男性听力损失、疑似职业性噪声聋和职业性噪声聋检出率均高于女性, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。听力损失、疑似职业性噪声聋和职业性噪声聋检出率均有随年龄增长和工龄增长而升高的趋势(P < 0.05)。来自不同规模、不同经济类型企业的员工听力损失、疑似职业性噪声聋和职业性噪声聋检出率差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。听力损失检出率以大型企业最低, 港、澳、台商投资企业的听力损失、疑似职业性噪声聋和职业性噪声聋检出率均较低。不同行业类型企业听力损失异常率、疑似职业病检出率的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05), 均以建筑行业噪声作业企业员工最高。
    结论 深圳市噪声作业员工职业健康状况不容乐观。亟须加强对中型及以下规模企业、建筑行业等重点企业的专项调查与职业健康风险评估, 采取有针对性的预防控制对策, 预防职业性听力损失的发生。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To understand the occupational health status of workers exposed to noise, and furthermore to provide orientation for prevention and control of occupational diseases.
    Methods Occupational health surveillance data among workers exposed to noise in Shenzhen were collected and analyzed. The work on occupational health surveillance was performed according to the Requirements of Main Occupational Diseases Surveillance and Occupational Health Risk Assessment Program in China.
    Results Totally, 77 319 workers exposed to noise were included. The detection rates of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL), the suspected occupational noise deafness, and the occupational noise deafness were 9.48%, 0.28%, 0.17%, respectively. It showed that the male had higher morbidity than the female(P < 0.05)and the workers with longer exposure time had a higher morbidity(P < 0.05). It was noted that the morbidity varied in different enterprises, in terms of scales, types of economy and industry types (P < 0.05). The morbidity in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan enterprises was lower, while morbidity in the construction industry was higher.
    Conclusion The occupational hazards cannot be neglected among the workers exposed to noise in Shenzhen. It is urgent to launch special investigation and occupational disease surveillance on noise exposure enterprises, especially in the small or micro enterprises and construction enterprises, and take the targeted measures to prevent the occupational noise deafness and protect workers' health effectively.

     

/

返回文章
返回