卢建国, 唐杰彬, 邓小懂, 薛来俊, 刘晓君. 基于两种ICMM风险评估模型研究某蓄电池生产企业职业健康风险[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2020, 38(5): 482-486. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.05.011
引用本文: 卢建国, 唐杰彬, 邓小懂, 薛来俊, 刘晓君. 基于两种ICMM风险评估模型研究某蓄电池生产企业职业健康风险[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2020, 38(5): 482-486. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.05.011
LU Jianguo, TANG Jiebin, DENG Xiaodong, XUE Laijun, LIU Xiaojun. Occupational health risk assessment of a lead-acid battery enterprise based on two models of ICMM occupational health risk assessment[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2020, 38(5): 482-486. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.05.011
Citation: LU Jianguo, TANG Jiebin, DENG Xiaodong, XUE Laijun, LIU Xiaojun. Occupational health risk assessment of a lead-acid battery enterprise based on two models of ICMM occupational health risk assessment[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2020, 38(5): 482-486. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.05.011

基于两种ICMM风险评估模型研究某蓄电池生产企业职业健康风险

Occupational health risk assessment of a lead-acid battery enterprise based on two models of ICMM occupational health risk assessment

  • 摘要:
    目的 采用国际采矿与金属委员会(ICMM)职业健康风险评估方法评估某蓄电池企业职业健康风险,探讨该方法的适用性,为企业采取合适的职业卫生管理方法提供科学依据。
    方法 采用ICMM风险评估技术中定性评估矩阵和定量评估模型两种方法,对某蓄电池企业关键岗位工人的职业健康风险进行评估,并比较、分析方法的适用性。
    结果 矩阵法评估结果:极板打磨、分板、极板入壳、铸板、极板焊接等岗位接触铅所致铅中毒的健康风险为中等风险,分板、极板入壳、铸板等岗位接触噪声所致听力损失或噪声聋的健康风险为高风险,其他岗位健康风险水平为低风险或非常低风险。定量评估模型评估结果:和膏、分板打磨、极板打磨、分板、极板入壳、铸板、极板焊接等岗位接触铅所致铅中毒的健康风险为不可容忍风险,涂板、极板打磨、分板、极板入壳、铸板等岗位接触噪声所致听力损失或噪声聋的健康风险为不可容忍风险;其他岗位健康风险水平为可容忍的风险。
    结论 铅和噪声是蓄电池企业健康风险水平最高的危害因素,企业应采取改进生产工艺、调整原有防护设施和加强职业卫生管理等措施来降低职业健康风险。矩阵法和定量法评估结果各有偏倚,矩阵法风险评估结果所得危害等级比定量法的低。在实际应用中应结合现场检测结果和职业健康检查结果来综合考虑岗位健康风险水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The occupational health risk assessment of a battery enterprise was carried out by using the ICMM occupational health risk assessment method, and the applicability of this method was discussed, to provide a scientific basis for occupational health management methods for enterprises.
    Methods ICMM risk assessment technology qualitative evaluation matrix and quantitative evaluation model were used to evaluate the occupational health risk of workers in a battery enterprise, and then the applicability of the method was analyzed.
    Results The qualitative evaluation matrix method showed that the health risks of lead poisoning caused by exposure to lead in the worksites of plate grinding, plate splitting, plate assemble into the shell, plate casting and plate welding were ranked as medium; the health risks of hearing loss or noise deafness caused by noise exposure in the worksites such as plate cutting, plate assemble into shell and plate casting were ranked as high; and the health risks at the remaining worksites were ranked as potential, low or very low. The quantitative assessment model showed that the health risks of lead poisoning caused by exposure to lead in the worksites of mixing, plate grinding, plate splitting, plate assemble into shell, plate casting and plate welding were ranked as intolerable; the health risks of hearing loss or noise deafness caused by noise exposure in worksites such as coated plate, plate grinding, plate splitting, plate assemble into shell and plate casting were ranked as intolerable; and the health risks of the remaining worksites were ranked as potential or tolerable.
    Conclusion Lead and noise were the most harmful factors in this battery enterprises. Enterprises should take measures to reduce occupational health risks, such as improving production technology, adjusting original protective facilities and strengthening occupational health management. The results of matrix method and quantitative method were different, and the risk level showed by matrix method was lower than that showed by quantitative method. In practical application, the health risk level at each worksite should be considered in combination with the occupational hazards monitoring results and workers' occupational health examination results.

     

/

返回文章
返回