沈连华, 李爱霞, 段明珍. 南通市居民应急准备现状及影响因素分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2021, 39(2): 171-174. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.02.010
引用本文: 沈连华, 李爱霞, 段明珍. 南通市居民应急准备现状及影响因素分析[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2021, 39(2): 171-174. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.02.010
SHEN Lianhua, LI Aixia, DUAN Mingzhen. Investigation on the status and influencing factors of residents' emergency preparedness in Nantong City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2021, 39(2): 171-174. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.02.010
Citation: SHEN Lianhua, LI Aixia, DUAN Mingzhen. Investigation on the status and influencing factors of residents' emergency preparedness in Nantong City[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2021, 39(2): 171-174. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2021.02.010

南通市居民应急准备现状及影响因素分析

Investigation on the status and influencing factors of residents' emergency preparedness in Nantong City

  • 摘要:
      目的  对南通市居民应急准备现状进行问卷调查,并对其影响因素进行分析。
      方法  采用多阶段整群随机抽样的方法,抽取南通市768名18岁以上常住居民为调查对象,由经过统一培训的调查员对其进行问卷调查;采用多因素logistic回归分析影响居民应急准备现状的相关因素。
      结果  768名被调查对象中:已经做好了各种应急准备的占12.63%,未采取任何应急准备的占39.84%;仅备用常用应急物品的占24.09%,没有配备任何应急物品的占38.80%;对本地区应急事件不关心的占34.77%,非常关心的占20.05%;和家人从不讨论应急事件的占18.49%,经常讨论的占38.80%。多因素分析发现:(1)年龄≥ 30岁(OR=1.538)、文化程度在大专及以上(OR=1.479)、家庭月收入≥ 3 000元(OR=1.437)、有应急经历(OR=1.678)、有应急教育或培训经历(OR=1.587)是居民有应急准备的促成因素(P均 < 0.05);(2)年龄≥ 30岁(OR=1.508)、文化程度在大专及以上(OR=1.464)、家庭月收入≥ 3 000元(OR=1.422)、有应急经历(OR=1.733)、有应急教育或培训经历(OR=1.639)是居民配备应急物品的促成因素(P均 < 0.05)。
      结论  南通市居民应急准备水平有待提高,应加强应急教育及训练,进一步提高公众的应急水平和能力。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  To investigate the status of emergency preparedness of residents in Nantong City and analyze its influencing factors.
      Methods  A total of 768 permanent residents over 18 years old in Nantong City were investigated with questionnaire by uniformly trained investigators. The related factors influencing the status of residents' emergency preparedness were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression.
      Results  Among the 768 respondents, 12.63% had made all kinds of emergency preparations, while 39.84% had not taken any emergency preparations; Only 24.09% had kept common emergency supplies, while 38.80% hadn't prepare any emergency supplies; 20.05% concerned much about local emergency events, while 34.77% had no concern about local emergency events; 18.49% had never discussed emergency events with their families, while 38.8% had often discussed them. The multivariate analysis showed that: (1) the contributing factors for residents to have emergency preparedness included the elder(OR=1.538, age ≥ 30 years old vs. less than 30), higher education level(OR=1.479, the junior college or above vs. the lower), higher family monthly income(OR=1.437, ≥ 3 000 yuan vs. less than 3000), emergency experience (OR=1.678, yes vs. no), and emergency education or training experience (OR=1.587, yes vs. no)(P < 0.05).(2) The contributing factors for residents to equip with emergency supplies included the elder(OR=1.587), higher education level(OR=1.464), higher family monthly income(OR=1.422), emergency experience (OR=1.733), and emergency education or training experience (OR=1.639)(P < 0.05).
      Conclusions  The emergency preparedness level of residents in Nantong City needs to be improved. Emergency education and training should be strengthened to further improve the public's emergency level and ability.

     

/

返回文章
返回