徐爱国, 朱宝立, 张恒东, 孙娟, 王飞霞. 某动力型锂电池制造企业职业病危害调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2023, 41(6): 736-739, 756. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.06.016
引用本文: 徐爱国, 朱宝立, 张恒东, 孙娟, 王飞霞. 某动力型锂电池制造企业职业病危害调查[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2023, 41(6): 736-739, 756. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.06.016
XU Aiguo, ZHU Baoli, ZHANG Hengdong, SUN Juan, WANG Feixia. Investigation on occupational hazards in a power lithium battery manufacturing enterprise[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2023, 41(6): 736-739, 756. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.06.016
Citation: XU Aiguo, ZHU Baoli, ZHANG Hengdong, SUN Juan, WANG Feixia. Investigation on occupational hazards in a power lithium battery manufacturing enterprise[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2023, 41(6): 736-739, 756. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.06.016

某动力型锂电池制造企业职业病危害调查

Investigation on occupational hazards in a power lithium battery manufacturing enterprise

  • 摘要:
    目的 分析某动力型锂电池制造企业职业病危害因素及其接触水平,评估职业病防护设施效果,提出相关对策与建议。
    方法 通过职业卫生现场调查和检测、职业健康检查及工程分析等方法进行综合评价。
    结果 该企业主要职业病危害因素为粉尘(炭黑粉尘、石墨粉尘、其他粉尘、电焊烟尘)、N-甲基吡咯烷酮、金属镍与难溶性镍化合物、锰及其无机化合物、钴及其化合物、氟化物、氟化氢、臭氧、二氧化氮、丁酮、噪声、激光辐射、工频电场、高温等。激光焊接岗位臭氧超标,最高浓度达0.54 mg/m3,岗位作业分级为Ⅱ级(中度危害作业)。装配车间卷绕岗位、入壳岗位、组装点焊和注液机岗位的噪声超标,其中卷绕岗位、组装点焊和注液机岗位噪声作业分级为Ⅰ级(轻度危害);入壳岗位8 h等效声级(LEX,8 h)达90.8 dB(A),作业分级为Ⅱ级(中度危害)。其余各岗位的粉尘浓度、毒物浓度、噪声声级均符合职业接触限值要求。该企业的职业病防护设施、应急救援设施、个体防护用品配置及职业健康监护基本符合相关规范要求。
    结论 该企业属于职业病危害风险严重项目,需关注产生臭氧、氟化氢及噪声危害的岗位,建议进一步完善职业病防护设施与应急救援设施,加强个体防护。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the occupational hazards factors and exposure levels in a power lithium battery manufacturing enterprise, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of occupational prevention facilities, and to propose relevant control countermeasures.
    Methods A comprehensive evaluation was conducted in this manufacture by using occupational health field investigation, environmental monitoring, occupational health examination, and engineering analysis methods.
    Results The main occupational hazards in the enterprise were dust(carbon black, graphite, other dusts, welding fume), Nmethylpyrrolidone, metallic nickel and insoluble nickel compounds, manganese and its inorganic compounds, cobalt and its compounds, fluoride, hydrogen fluoride, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, butanone, noise, laser radiation, power frequency electric field, and high temperature environment. Among them, the ozone concentration at the laser welding position was higher than the national standard, with the highest concentration of 0.54 mg/m3, and this position was classified as grade Ⅱ(moderate hazard). The noise in the winding positions, shell entry positions, assembly spot welding, and liquid injection machine positions in the assembly workshop exceeds the national standard. In the assembly workshop, the noise at the winding, the assembly-spot welding, and the injection-machine positions were classified as grade Ⅰ(mild hazard), while the 8-hour equivalent sound level(LEX, 8 h) at the shell entry position was high at 90.8 dB(A), and the operation was classified as grade Ⅱ(moderate hazard). The dust concentration, toxicant concentration, and noise level at the other positions were low and in compliance with the national standards. The occupational prevention facilities, emergency rescue facilities, personal protective equipment configuration, and occupational health monitoring of the enterprise basically met the relevant specification requirements.
    Conclusions The enterprise is recognized as a project with serious occupational risk, and the positions where workers and exposed to ozone, hydrogen fluoride, and noise need to be paid attention to. It is still required to sustainably improve the occupational prevention facilities and emergency rescue facilities and strengthen individual protection.

     

/

返回文章
返回