文鹏, 张华, 安花花, 张晓燕. 部队官兵心理弹性与时间洞察力的特征及关系研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(1): 10-14. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.002
引用本文: 文鹏, 张华, 安花花, 张晓燕. 部队官兵心理弹性与时间洞察力的特征及关系研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(1): 10-14. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.002
WEN Peng, ZHANG Hua, AN Huahua, ZHANG Xiaoyan. Characteristics and relationship between psychological resilience and time perspective among military personnel[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(1): 10-14. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.002
Citation: WEN Peng, ZHANG Hua, AN Huahua, ZHANG Xiaoyan. Characteristics and relationship between psychological resilience and time perspective among military personnel[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(1): 10-14. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.002

部队官兵心理弹性与时间洞察力的特征及关系研究

Characteristics and relationship between psychological resilience and time perspective among military personnel

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨部队官兵心理弹性现状,分析其可能的影响因素,提升部队官兵的心理健康。
    方法 2023年3月,使用《心理弹性量表》(Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale,CD-RISC)和《津巴多时间洞察力量表》(Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory,ZTPI)对某部队200名官兵进行调查。采用Pearson相关分析和多元线性回归来探讨基层部队官兵心理弹性与时间洞察力的关系。
    结果 回收有效问卷196份,有效回收率为98.0%。不同年龄、性别、军龄、受教育程度和婚姻状况的部队官兵的时间洞察力和心理弹性各维度得分差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。官兵心理弹性总分为(70.86 ± 13.48)分。时间洞察力各维度中,过去积极、未来维度得分较高。线性回归分析结果表明:过去积极和未来维度得分每提高1分,心理弹性总分相应提高6.046、7.722分(P < 0.001)。
    结论 部队官兵心理弹性水平良好,官兵的时间洞察力更倾向于过去积极和未来。过去积极和未来可能是良好心理弹性的预测因子,建议部队录取时间洞察力中过去积极和未来得分较高的官兵,以提高官兵整体心理弹性水平。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To investigate the current situation of psychological resilience among military personnel, analyze its possible influencing factors, and improve their mental health.
    Methods In March 2023, 200 grassroots military personnel from a unit were surveyed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression were used to explore the relationship between psychological resilience and time perspective among these personnel.
    Results A total of 196 valid questionnaires were collected, with a recovery rate of 98.0%. There was no significant difference in the scores of time perspective and psychological resilience dimensions among these grassroots military personnel with different ages, genders, military service times, educational levels, and marital status (P > 0.05). The total score of psychological resilience was (70.86 ± 13.48). Among the dimensions of time perspective, the scores of the past positive and future dimensions were higher. Linear regression analysis showed that for every one-point increase in the scores of past positive and future dimensions, the total score of psychological resilience increased by 6.046 and 7.722 points, respectively (P < 0.001).
    Conclusions The level of psychological resilience among these grassroots military personnel was good, and their time perspective tended to be past positive and future. Past positive and future might be predictive factors of good psychological resilience. It is suggested that military personnel with higher scores of past positive and future in the time perspective should be recruited to improve the overall level of psychological resilience among military personnel.

     

/

返回文章
返回