刘超, 陈育全, 赵亚娟, 敖正, 熊璐, 孙玉琦. 压力控制容量保证通气对尘肺病全肺灌洗患者呼吸功能的影响[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2025, 43(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2025.240435
引用本文: 刘超, 陈育全, 赵亚娟, 敖正, 熊璐, 孙玉琦. 压力控制容量保证通气对尘肺病全肺灌洗患者呼吸功能的影响[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2025, 43(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2025.240435
LIU Chao, CHEN Yuquan, ZHAO Yajuan, AO Zheng, XIONG Lu, SUN Yuqi. Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed model on respiratory function in pneumoconiosis patients undergoing whole-lung lavage[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2025, 43(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2025.240435
Citation: LIU Chao, CHEN Yuquan, ZHAO Yajuan, AO Zheng, XIONG Lu, SUN Yuqi. Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed model on respiratory function in pneumoconiosis patients undergoing whole-lung lavage[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2025, 43(1): 41-45. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2025.240435

压力控制容量保证通气对尘肺病全肺灌洗患者呼吸功能的影响

Effect of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed model on respiratory function in pneumoconiosis patients undergoing whole-lung lavage

  • 摘要:
    目的 评价尘肺病全肺灌洗患者采用压力控制容量保证通气(pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed,PCV-VG)模式对患者呼吸功能的影响。
    方法 选择2019年9月—2023年9月行全肺灌洗(whole-lung lavage,WLL)的尘肺病患者为研究对象,根据当时治疗时采用的通气方式不同分为两组:PCV-VG组和容量控制通气(volume-controlled ventilation,VCV)模式组,采用随机数字表法每组抽取30例。两组患者分别在单肺PCV-VG、VCV模式机械通气下实施全肺灌洗并复苏。采集患者入院后(T0)、灌洗前(T1)、灌洗结束(T2)、复苏早期30 min(T3)、复苏后期60 min(T4)、术后第1个24 h(T5)、术后第二个24 h(T6)、术后第3个24 h(T7)的桡动脉血血气分析结果,包括氧分压(PaO2)、二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、肺泡-动脉氧分压差(PA-aDO2)、乳酸(LAC)水平,以及T1T2T3T4阶段的气道峰压(Ppeak)、气道平台压(Pplat)、动态肺顺应性(Cldyn)及驱动压(DP)等数据,分析比较各指标的差异。
    结果 两组患者在年龄、体质量指数、尘肺病分期方面差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。PCV-VG组与VCV组各指标在各时间点比较的结果如下:在T1时间点,两组血气分析各指标差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在T2时间点,PCV-VG组PaCO2低于VCV组(均P < 0.05);T3时间点,PCV-VG组PaO2高于VCV组,PaCO2低于VCV组(均P < 0.05);T4时间点,PCV-VG组PaO2高于VCV组,PaCO2、PA-aDO2、LAC低于VCV组(均P < 0.05);T6时间点,PCV-VG组PA-aDO2、LAC低于VCV组(均P < 0.05);T7时间点,PCV-VG组PaCO2低于VCV组(P < 0.05)。在T1时间点,两组呼吸力学各项参数指标差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);在T2T3T4时间点,PCV-VG组PpeakPplat较低(P < 0.01),Cldyn较高(P < 0.05);在T3时间点,PCV-VG组DP较低(P < 0.01)。
    结论 与VCV模式比较,PCV-VG模式可以降低患者气道压力和呼吸机驱动压,提高肺顺应性,维持良好的氧供应,有利于患者呼吸功能保护。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the effect of pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode on the respiratory function of patients undergoing whole-lung lavage (WLL) for pneumoconiosis.
    Methods Pneumoconiosis patients who underwent WLL from September 2019 to September 2023 were divided into two groups according to the ventilation mode used during original treatment, the PCV-VG or the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), with a total of 30 patients in each group randomly selected by random number table method. Patients in the two groups were subjected to whole-lung lavage and resuscitated under one-lung PCV-VG and VCV mode mechanical ventilation, respectively. Their medical records of radial artery blood gas analysis, including partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference (PA-aDO2), and lactate (LAC), were collected at admission (T0), before lavage (T1), at the end of lavage (T2), 30 minutes after early resuscitation (T3), 60 minutes after late resuscitation (T4), 24 hours post-operation (T5), 48 hours post-operation (T6), and 72 hours post-operation (T7). Additionally, the indicators of respiratory function, such as peak airway pressure (Ppeak), plateau pressure (Pplat), dynamic lung compliance (Cldyn), and driving pressure (DP), were recorded at T1, T2, T3, and T4 points in time. The differences of each observation index were analyzed and compared.
    Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, BMI, and pneumoconiosis stage (all P > 0.05). Comparison of blood gas analysis results between the PCV-VG group and the VCV group: at T1, no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05); at T2, PaCO2 was lower in the PCV-VG group than in the VCV group (P < 0.05); at T3, PaO2 was higher, and PaCO2 was lower in the PCV-VG group than in the VCV group (both P < 0.05); at T4, PaO2 was higher, and PaCO2, PA-aDO2, and LAC were lower in the PCV-VG group (all P < 0.05); at T6, PA-aDO2 and LAC were lower in the PCV-VG group (both P < 0.05); at T7, PaCO2 was lower in the PCV-VG group (P < 0.05). At T1, the differences between the respiratory mechanics parameter indexes of the two groups were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05); at T2, T3, and T4, Ppeak and Pplat were lower (both P < 0.01), and Cldyn was higher (P < 0.05) in the PCV-VG group than in the VCV group; at T3, DP was lower in the PCV-VG group (P < 0.01).
    Conclusions Compared with the VCV mode, the PCV-VG mode could reduce airway pressure and ventilator driving pressure, improve lung compliance, maintain good oxygen supply, and protect the respiratory function of patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回