陈涛, 景华平. 新旧模式长途转诊516例急危重症患者效果比较[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2015, 33(2): 96-97,126. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.02.007
引用本文: 陈涛, 景华平. 新旧模式长途转诊516例急危重症患者效果比较[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2015, 33(2): 96-97,126. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.02.007
CHEN Tao, JING Hua-ping. Different arrangements of long-distance transfer of critically ill patients[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2015, 33(2): 96-97,126. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.02.007
Citation: CHEN Tao, JING Hua-ping. Different arrangements of long-distance transfer of critically ill patients[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2015, 33(2): 96-97,126. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.02.007

新旧模式长途转诊516例急危重症患者效果比较

Different arrangements of long-distance transfer of critically ill patients

  • 摘要: 目的 评价两种长途转诊模式对急危重症病例的临床效果,探讨专业化、规范化的院前急救流程,以达到安全快捷的转诊目的。 方法 选择2010年1月至2014年8月由应城市人民医院单向转往武汉的516例病例为调查对象。原模式组转诊214例,由所属临床专科医生和护士负责途中转诊;新模式组转诊302例,由该院急救中心院前急救医生和护士负责;对两组转诊效果进行统计学比较。 结果 原模式组平均转诊时间(121 ±8) min,生命体征不稳定63例,窒息18例,死亡6例。新模式组的平均转诊时间(90 ±8) min,生命体征不稳定45例,窒息12例,死亡5例。两组平均转诊时间比较,差异有统计学意义(t=1.028,P<0.05);生命体征不平稳率、窒息发生率比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.997、4.504,P<0.05),两组转诊途中病死率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.791,P>0.05)。 结论 科学化的管理模式,专业化的院前急救队伍,制度化的院前急救流程,规范化的转诊临床路径,是基层医院安全快捷转诊急危重症患者的重要保证。

     

    Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of two arrangements of long-distance transfer of critically ill patients. Methods Totally 516 critically ill patients in Yingcheng were transferred to Wuhan,of whom 214 cases were previously accompanied by general clinical doctors and nurses (first group),while 302 cases by pre-hospital emergency doctors and nurses (second group).The association of patients'fate with these accompanying modes was evaluated. Results The transferring time was (121 ±8) min for first group patients,while (90 ±8) min for second group patients.Among the first group,63 cases had unstable vital signs,18 cases had suffocation and 6 cases died,while in the second group,45 cases had unstable vital signs,12 cases had suffocation and 5 cases died,respectively.It showed that the first group patients had longer transferring time (t=1.028,P<0.05),increased rates of stable vital signs and suffocation (χ2=15.997,4.504,respectively,P<0.05). Conclusion The accompany by pre-hospital emergency doctors and nurses is good for the long-distance transfer of critically ill patients.

     

/

返回文章
返回