杨雪姬, 郭冠浩, 陈纠. 全自动间断化学分析仪测定工作场所空气中甲醛[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(1): 93-96. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.020
引用本文: 杨雪姬, 郭冠浩, 陈纠. 全自动间断化学分析仪测定工作场所空气中甲醛[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援, 2024, 42(1): 93-96. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.020
YANG Xueji, GUO Guanhao, CHEN Jiu. Determination of formaldehyde in workplace air by the automatic discrete analyzer[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(1): 93-96. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.020
Citation: YANG Xueji, GUO Guanhao, CHEN Jiu. Determination of formaldehyde in workplace air by the automatic discrete analyzer[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(1): 93-96. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.01.020

全自动间断化学分析仪测定工作场所空气中甲醛

Determination of formaldehyde in workplace air by the automatic discrete analyzer

  • 摘要:
    目的 建立工作场所空气中甲醛的全自动间断化学分析仪检测方法。
    方法 使用间断化学分析仪代替手工方法进行甲醛的测定,确定检测步骤和测试工作条件,观察该方法的线性范围、检出限、准确度、精密度等指标,并与GBZ/T 300.99—2017方法进行比对试验。
    结果 甲醛在质量浓度为0~0.4 mg/L范围内时与吸光度呈线性关系,相关系数> 0.999 9,检出限为0.000 9 mg/L,最低检出质量浓度为0.001 5 mg/m3(以采集3 L空气样品计算)。方法的批内精密度为2.39%~4.75%,批间精密度为2.91%~9.30%。标准样品测定结果在标定值范围内。该方法用于工作场所空气中甲醛的测定时,其测定值与国家标准方法测定值的相对误差在10%以内,两组结果具有良好的线性相关性(r=0.998,P < 0.001)。
    结论 间断化学分析仪测定甲醛的自动化程度高、灵敏度高、线性关系好、精密度好、准确度高,可代替手工法,适用于工作场所空气中甲醛的批量、高效检测。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To establish a method for the detection of formaldehyde in workplace air by the automatic discrete analyzer.
    Methods The discontinuous chemical analyzer was used instead of the manual method for the determination of formaldehyde. The detection steps and test working conditions were determined; the linear range, detection limit, accuracy, precision, and other indicators of the method were observed and compared with the GBZ/T 300.99-2017 method.
    Results There was a linear relationship between formaldehyde concentration ranging from 0 to 0.4 mg/L and absorbance, with a correlation coefficient of 0.999 9. The detection limit was 0.000 9 mg/L, and the minimum detection concentration was 0.001 5 mg/m3(calculated by collecting 3 L of air sample). The intra-assay precision was 2.39%-4.75%, and the inter-assay precision was 2.91%-9.30%. The results of the standard samples were within the calibration range. When this method was used for the determination of formaldehyde in the air of the workplaces, the relative error between the measured value and the value derived by the national standard method was within 10%, and the two groups of results had a good linear correlation(r=0.998, P < 0.001).
    Conclusions The automatic discrete analyzer had a high degree of automation, sensitivity, linear relationship, precision, and accuracy in determining formaldehyde in the air of the workplaces. It can replace the manual method and is suitable for efficient detection of formaldehyde in the air of the workplaces.

     

/

返回文章
返回