official WeChat

ZHOU Yuanyuan, WANG Jin, CHEN Wei, MIAO Yuji. Analysis of a provincial CDC's results in the comparison of national biological dose estimation capability from 2017 to 2022[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(5): 620-623. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.05.011
Citation: ZHOU Yuanyuan, WANG Jin, CHEN Wei, MIAO Yuji. Analysis of a provincial CDC's results in the comparison of national biological dose estimation capability from 2017 to 2022[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2024, 42(5): 620-623. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2024.05.011
shu

Analysis of a provincial CDC's results in the comparison of national biological dose estimation capability from 2017 to 2022

  • Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jiangsu Provincial Academy of Preventive Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China

More Information
  • Received Date: April 01, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objective 

    To improve the biological dose estimation capability in responding to nuclear and radiation emergencies by analyzing the results and deviation causes from a provincial CDC's laboratory participating in the national biological dose estimation capability assessment.

    Methods 

    The data of a provincial center for disease control and prevention's radiological biology laboratory participating in the national biological dose estimation capability assessment from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. The number of cells analyzed for chromosomal aberrations, the rate of dicentric (dic) and ring (r) chromosome aberrations, and the rate of dic+r aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of each sample were sorted out. The relative deviation between the estimated value and the irradiation dose of the assessed samples was analyzed. From 2017 to 2021, the dose was estimated using the dose-response curve in GB/T 28236-2011. In 2022, the dose was estimated using the dose-response curve established by the provincial CDC itself.

    Results 

    All 12 biological dose assessment samples from 2017 to 2022 were 100% qualified, with relative deviations all ≤ 20%, among which 4 samples had relative deviations ≤ 5%, accounting for 33.3%. The estimated doses of 8 samples were lower than the actual irradiation dose, accounting for 66.7%. The average dose estimated by the dose-response curve of the laboratory was (2.16 ± 1.26) Gy, while the average dose estimated by the dose-response curve recommended in GB/T 28236-2011 was (2.15 ± 1.26) Gy, and there was no statistically significant difference between these two standard curves (P > 0.05).

    Conclusions 

    The quality of chromosome specimen preparation and the experience of technical personnel are two important factors affecting the quality of biological dose estimation. Improving the quality of chromosome specimen preparation and strengthening the ability of laboratory technicians to identify chromosomal aberration indicators can improve the accuracy of biological dose estimation for personnel in nuclear and radiation emergencies.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (9)
  • [1]
    刘建香, 黄敏燕, 阮健磊, 等. 哈尔滨事故受照者的生物剂量估算[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2006, 26(5): 460-462.
    [2]
    秦永春, 周献锋, 熊晓芸, 等. 南京铱-19放射源丢失事故受照者生物剂量估算[J]. 中国职业医学, 2016, 43(3): 305-307.
    [3]
    中华人民共和国卫生部, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 染色体畸变估算生物剂量方法: GB/T 2836—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
    [4]
    张忠新, 张睿凤, 张慧芳, 等. 常用辐射生物剂量计的研究现状[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2016, 28(4): 325-328.
    [5]
    AGRAWALA P K, ADHIKARI J S, CHAUDHURY N K. Lymphocyte chromosomal aberration assay in radiation biodosimetry[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2010, 2(3): 197-201. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.68501
    [6]
    RYU T, KIM J H, KIM J K. Chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes after exposure to ionizing radiation[J]. Genome Integr, 2016, 7: 5.
    [7]
    潘艳, 阮健磊, 高刚, 等. 2022年全国生物剂量估算和染色体畸变分析能力比对结果分析[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2024, 44(3): 223-227.
    [8]
    吴丽娜, 潘艳, 阮健磊, 等. 全国生物剂量估算能力考核结果分析[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2018, 38(5): 360-363.
    [9]
    阮健磊, 陆雪, 陈德清, 等. 2007年全国染色体畸变分析估算辐射生物剂量比对[J]. 中国辐射卫生, 2008, 17(3): 259-261.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]DONG Meiying, XIE Yingchun, SUN Jianyun, LI Yongjun, WANG Yuxia, LUO Shan. Analysis of inter-laboratory comparison results of occupational health testing laboratories in Gansu Province from 2019 to 2021[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2023, 41(4): 499-502. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2023.04.021
    [2]LIU Zequan, LIU Lihua, WANG Haijiao, WU Jiaqi. Analysis of inter-laboratory comparison results of national occupational health service institutions in 2019[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2022, 40(5): 611-613. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2022.05.021
    [3]GAO Chaoxian, HUI Changye, YANG Xueqin, LI Limei, CHEN Yuting, LIU Zhengyu, YI Juan. Calculation method of Poisson distribution confidence interval and its application in estimating radiation biological dose by using Excel[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2022, 40(2): 212-217. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2022.02.017
    [4]HE Jiaheng, ZHANG Aihua, MA Anping, RONG Weifeng, ZENG Feifei, WU Banghua. Inter-laboratory comparison on detection of ammonia concentration in solution in Guangdong Province in 2014 and 2019[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2020, 38(6): 653-656. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2020.06.023
    [5]ZHAO Yiqing, TAO Haihua, CHEN Xiang, ZHENG Hua, LIU Qian, XU Dongfu, GU Jianfeng, JIANG Wei. Comparison of methods for testing oxidizing hazard of solid substances[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2019, 37(1): 86-89. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2019.01.025
    [6]ZUO Hui, XU Qirong, DU Weijia, ZHOU Hailin, LIU Yimin, ZHU Feng. Effectiveness evaluation of practice of quality control for occupational health testing[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2018, 36(2): 97-100. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2018.02.002
    [7]GAO Chaoxian, HUI Changye, YANG Xueqin, LIU Zhengyu, LI Limei, CHEN Yuting, ZHANG Wen. Estimation of biological dose of radiation based on the number of chromosomal aberration in the cells with chromosomes less than 45[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2017, 35(1): 62-63. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2017.01.020
    [9]ZHU Feng, DU Weijia, ZUO Hui, ZHOU Hailin, LIU Yimin. Implementation of period checking of laboratory for occupational health and evaluation of related data[J]. Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue, 2015, 33(4): 240-242. DOI: 10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2015.04.004

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (44) PDF downloads (30) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    Address：94 Zhongcao Road, Xuhui District, ShanghaiTel：（021）22836267，22836268Email：zywssh@163.com

    Website Copyright© 2019 Editorial Office of Occupational Health and Emergency Rescue 沪ICP备08011864号-6

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return